<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two stunning, one very good and one shagged out Riesling. Oh and some Cornas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elitistreview.com/2010/02/03/two-stunning-one-very-good-and-one-shagged-out-riesling-oh-and-some-cornas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elitistreview.com/2010/02/03/two-stunning-one-very-good-and-one-shagged-out-riesling-oh-and-some-cornas/</link>
	<description>The limits of pleasure are yet to be defined or reached&#160;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:53:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2010/02/03/two-stunning-one-very-good-and-one-shagged-out-riesling-oh-and-some-cornas/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=209#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Rangen was definitely over the hill. But the other three were all very good: I liked the Boxler the best. It was less huge than the Weinbach or the Z-H, and I thought more refined. And the Weinbach was a notch or two above the Z-H Brand, which could have done with a bit more acidity to balance its massiveness and residual sugar. But I think possibly I&#039;m starting to understand what Brand is about. Ah, it&#039;s entertaining educating ourselves in the ways of Alsace Grands Crus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Rangen was definitely over the hill. But the other three were all very good: I liked the Boxler the best. It was less huge than the Weinbach or the Z-H, and I thought more refined. And the Weinbach was a notch or two above the Z-H Brand, which could have done with a bit more acidity to balance its massiveness and residual sugar. But I think possibly I&#8217;m starting to understand what Brand is about. Ah, it&#8217;s entertaining educating ourselves in the ways of Alsace Grands Crus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Strange</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2010/02/03/two-stunning-one-very-good-and-one-shagged-out-riesling-oh-and-some-cornas/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>David Strange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=209#comment-82</guid>
		<description> Oh Peter and Daniel will confirm it was past it. The Weinbach and Boxler were amazingly good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Oh Peter and Daniel will confirm it was past it. The Weinbach and Boxler were amazingly good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2010/02/03/two-stunning-one-very-good-and-one-shagged-out-riesling-oh-and-some-cornas/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=209#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Astonishing, I had the Rangen 2000 less than a year ago and it was completely fine. Are you not letting yourself be overly influenced by the dark color ZH&#039;s wines almost always have (high phenols and some botrytis) and the peaty character of Rangen? I&#039;m seeing some oxidized Alsace, but not quite at the rate your seeing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astonishing, I had the Rangen 2000 less than a year ago and it was completely fine. Are you not letting yourself be overly influenced by the dark color ZH&#8217;s wines almost always have (high phenols and some botrytis) and the peaty character of Rangen? I&#8217;m seeing some oxidized Alsace, but not quite at the rate your seeing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

