<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is not what I had expected, or indeed hoped for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elitistreview.com/2009/12/25/this-is-not-what-i-had-expected-or-indeed-hoped-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/12/25/this-is-not-what-i-had-expected-or-indeed-hoped-for/</link>
	<description>The limits of pleasure are yet to be defined or reached</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:39:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David Strange</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/12/25/this-is-not-what-i-had-expected-or-indeed-hoped-for/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>David Strange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=367#comment-206</guid>
		<description>The Pernot we had with the Schleiss Meister was so much better than this. I don&#039;t know exactly what was wrong with the BBM, but we gave it every chance. It was just so simple with so little to spark one&#039;s interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pernot we had with the Schleiss Meister was so much better than this. I don&#8217;t know exactly what was wrong with the BBM, but we gave it every chance. It was just so simple with so little to spark one&#8217;s interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/12/25/this-is-not-what-i-had-expected-or-indeed-hoped-for/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=367#comment-205</guid>
		<description>This is really damning. Of course, it&#039;s not surprising to read that Roulot was brilliant, at village or any other level. Pernot might not be quite up to those heady standards, but it should at least be pretty damned good. Strangely, the 1er Cru Pernot 2002 we had with James, Gernot and co. recently came off much better in the write-up than this Grand Cru. Something&#039;s up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really damning. Of course, it&#8217;s not surprising to read that Roulot was brilliant, at village or any other level. Pernot might not be quite up to those heady standards, but it should at least be pretty damned good. Strangely, the 1er Cru Pernot 2002 we had with James, Gernot and co. recently came off much better in the write-up than this Grand Cru. Something&#8217;s up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: elitistreview.com @ 2010-09-08 16:19:38 -->