<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Champagne or wallpaper, I&#8217;m not sure which</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/</link>
	<description>The limits of pleasure are yet to be defined or reached</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=517#comment-295</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got to give them credit for consistency! And to you for loyalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got to give them credit for consistency! And to you for loyalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Strange</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>David Strange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=517#comment-294</guid>
		<description>If I may spill the beans, I feel a bit of a fool for having purchased this. I&#039;ve had 1995 Presidence which was also piss boring. I&#039;ve also had two bottles of St Vincent 1990, one of which was reasonably good, the other was staggeringly dull. I should learn more quickly from my mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may spill the beans, I feel a bit of a fool for having purchased this. I&#8217;ve had 1995 Presidence which was also piss boring. I&#8217;ve also had two bottles of St Vincent 1990, one of which was reasonably good, the other was staggeringly dull. I should learn more quickly from my mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=517#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Remarkably similar, however unlikely, to the 1964 Cuvee St Vincent from Legras that I had in June.It smelt and tasted of only one thing: cream soda. Pleasant at first, but petrifyingly boring after that second sip.

Olympique sounds like a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkably similar, however unlikely, to the 1964 Cuvee St Vincent from Legras that I had in June.It smelt and tasted of only one thing: cream soda. Pleasant at first, but petrifyingly boring after that second sip.</p>
<p>Olympique sounds like a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed tully</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2009/09/18/champagne-or-wallpaper-im-not-sure-which/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>ed tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=517#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Olympique is the answer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympique is the answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

