What doesn’t qualify

As part of the humorous ‘taste crap wines’ weekend that included the quite worryingly disgusting [link2post id=”1391″]Blue Nun[/link2post] we also purchased a bottle of Frascati. It was quite an expensive bottle of Frascati as far as the supermarket’s selection went: a whole fiver. It had some fruit, a degree of bitter-almonds character and alcohol. It wasn’t bad, but it was sub-interest.

I was almost impressed when I first tried it; I didn’t feel immediately sick. However, I was incredibly bored by it. It was characterless, bland and incredibly one-dimensional. There was nothing beyond the the simplest of flavours there. It was so dull it wasn’t even refreshing.

Wines like this will always be sub-interesting, no matter how well-made or expensive they are. The last 1390″]bottle of Burgundy I opened was sub-interest because it only had big, slightly unripe tannins, and nothing else. There was no earthy complexity or charming fruit. It was just a dull, tannic monster.

This does not mean that actively unpleasant wines (like the Blue Nun) are not sub-interest because they are so aggressively horrible that they are interesting. I’m not interested in nasty things, and nor should you be.

To comment without logging in, enter your name below and then check "I'd rather post as guest".