<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My favourite Chianti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elitistreview.com/2006/03/21/my-favourite-chianti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elitistreview.com/2006/03/21/my-favourite-chianti/</link>
	<description>The limits of pleasure are yet to be defined or reached</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David Strange</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2006/03/21/my-favourite-chianti/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>David Strange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1491#comment-708</guid>
		<description>I pretty much agree. I was hoping for a considerably more interesting bottle of wine; it was merely good enough to drink with few complaints from either me or the neighbour. I&#039;ll try the 2001 if I see it, but I won&#039;t be buying the 1999 again. I think the 1999 didn&#039;t quite merit a &#039;sub-interest&#039; rating, it had quite a bit of life and was reasonably charming. I suppose this is Elitist Review, perhaps I should pay more attention to standards and not be so easily satisfied in the future!

David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree. I was hoping for a considerably more interesting bottle of wine; it was merely good enough to drink with few complaints from either me or the neighbour. I&#8217;ll try the 2001 if I see it, but I won&#8217;t be buying the 1999 again. I think the 1999 didn&#8217;t quite merit a &#8216;sub-interest&#8217; rating, it had quite a bit of life and was reasonably charming. I suppose this is Elitist Review, perhaps I should pay more attention to standards and not be so easily satisfied in the future!</p>
<p>David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gernot S</title>
		<link>http://elitistreview.com/2006/03/21/my-favourite-chianti/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Gernot S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1491#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Had a bottle about the same time. I thought the wine on the modern side but rather dull. There was a bit red fruit masked by some glue wooden flavors. 10 years ago a had a soft spot for Rancia but after a recent vertical I am less than convinced. 2001 funny enough was one of the better bottles. The 99 could have come from anywhere. Already one day after opening the wine was flabby and short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a bottle about the same time. I thought the wine on the modern side but rather dull. There was a bit red fruit masked by some glue wooden flavors. 10 years ago a had a soft spot for Rancia but after a recent vertical I am less than convinced. 2001 funny enough was one of the better bottles. The 99 could have come from anywhere. Already one day after opening the wine was flabby and short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

